Chloe Grace Moretz

Jobe1

Well-Known Member
well, nice to see that got reheated again. fake, not her. move on.

as a general pointer: using the search function could have spared us this thread.
I did so why doesn't everyone try calming down, all the threads I found we're talking about a totally different set of images, the original photo I posted wasn't being talked about, and I still haven't seen any proof that it's not her, she has the same lips exactly and her nipples are identical to when we saw her in that see through top
 

fooster

Well-Known Member
I did so why doesn't everyone try calming down, all the threads I found we're talking about a totally different set of images, the original photo I posted wasn't being talked about, and I still haven't seen any proof that it's not her, she has the same lips exactly and her nipples are identical to when we saw her in that see through top
Mate, I understand... However this set and many other circulating CGM pics have been debunked on this, as well as other sites. That was my pointer. No criticism towards your contribution, just observing that when time goes by, some stuff tends to make the rounds again. You can believe whatever you want, CGM or not. For me: no face, no proof, not her. Cheers man!
 

john_bob

Member
I did so why doesn't everyone try calming down, all the threads I found we're talking about a totally different set of images, the original photo I posted wasn't being talked about, and I still haven't seen any proof that it's not her, she has the same lips exactly and her nipples are identical to when we saw her in that see through top
You're looking at this wrong. The burden of proof lies with the affirmative - in this case it is the claim that it is her. When it comes to leaks, especially about alleged celebrity leaks, the default position should be "bullshit, that's not her" in which case proof needs to be demonstrated that it is who it is claimed to be. However in this case there is ample evidence, even on this site, to show that this is not genuinely Chloe.
 

Jobe1

Well-Known Member
Ok Im gonna say my point now if you get mad then you get mad, fuck it, I reverse searched the original picture I posted on TinEye and got nothing, I also reverse searched on google and all I got was "similar images" and they were just pictures of Chloe, there were a few sites that had posted the image I uploaded and on none of them was it debunked, the picture of her lying on the bed and the masturbating picture were, yes, but they are totally different people, the original picture I posted has a quite defined mole on her boob, the other pictures people are adding don't, so they aren't the same person, debunking one means fuck all for the other one, in the original fappening in 2014 there were actually a few real leaks with fake (not the actual celebrity) pictures thrown in with the set, either unintentionally or to fill them out some more as to make them more appealing to buyers, maybe the same has happened here, but i think its more than possible that its her, lastly, only one nipple is visible, she only has one nipple pierced, or at least has at some point because you can quite clearly see them in the see-through top pics, depending on if her camera is inverted or not that could explain why there is no piercing, thoughts?
 
J

jay86

Guest
Another excellent point. Any nude pic of Chloe without pierced nipples is...well, you know. She got them on her 18th birthday and she is American.

Not sure what the age of consent in England is (last I heard it was 6) but over here it's 18.

Edit: 16 lol

Do not know if it is her or not don't really care lol But you are correct Age of consent hear in the UK is 16 however distributing images or videos of under 18s is still classed as Child Pornography By UK Law just a a heads up.
 

Jobe1

Well-Known Member
Do not know if it is her or not don't really care lol But you are correct Age of consent hear in the UK is 16 however distributing images or videos of under 18s is still classed as Child Pornography By UK Law just a a heads up.
It is the dumbest fucking law to be fair, they class it as child pornography yet you can have sex with them, so by the governments rules wouldn't that mean they allow child abuse to happen legally? Fucking idiots, pictures should be legal
 

Geardagas

Well-Known Member
Simple Google image search indicates that the pic originates on celeb jihad, who fakes pretty much everything. They also posted it along side two other pics, and all three are clearly not the same girl, as they have laughably different tit sizes and nipples, and one even has a huge mole in the center of her chest while the other two do not. Screenshot_20170730-163528.png
 
Top