OnlyFans $@4@h J@yn£

[Drawers]

Did she chicken out of posting whatever it was

 

[headgear]

Did she chicken out of posting whatever it was

View attachment 2552594

1 min for 169 dollars and i bet it shows nothing

 

[Drawers]

View attachment 2552594

1 min for 169 dollars and i bet it shows nothing

Camilla likely totally naked and not Sarah, then prob the same price for the other part. Best part of $400 you would need to know what you’re getting

 

[fresh]

View attachment 2552594

1 min for 169 dollars and i bet it shows nothing

The preview though blurry looks like both gonna tease by unhook bras and hump the bed. Bet they turn round then minute ends as they do. Bet the second one shows them both full tits out (for £169 surely?) pulling knickers down show arse then turn round as the vid ends - i've done a lot of imagining with these two haha. Also this says 2/2 I presume 1/2 was shit?

 

[Drawers]

The blurred out arse of sarah looks like she’s got knickers on

 

[fresh]

The blurred out arse of sarah looks like she’s got knickers on

Agreed - both look deffo topless.

 

[HoleyMan]

I know there's such a thing as hype and SJD has done this before only to disappoint but get the feeling with this one could be good. If not it's bare faced criminality (excuse the pun) if there's no full tits and at least bare arse from both. SJD been doing this three years need a game changer. Who will be brave?

 

[MrMisters]

It’ll be a topless vid, that’s it, no pussy on show, fair play to anyone that buys it, it’ll leak eventually

 

[HoleyMan]

It’ll be a topless vid, that’s it, no pussy on show, fair play to anyone that buys it, it’ll leak eventually

Is it the most expensive ever? Emojis a clue certainly hints to inappropriate content.

 

[Drawers]

We’ve all seen her tits now at this stage surely keeping both her hands away isn’t worth that much now

 

[HoleyMan]

We’ve all seen her tits now at this stage surely keeping both her hands away isn’t worth that much now

Suppose it's also what's she's doing with Camilla as well.

 

[HoleyMan]

Some of their previous work to wet the whistle View attachment 2552825View attachment 2552826View attachment 2552827View attachment 2552828View attachment 2552829View attachment 2552830

 

[ShimmyShimmy]

View attachment 2552856View attachment 2552857

 

[56789]

View attachment 2552594

1 min for 169 dollars and i bet it shows nothing

Id expect at least pussy for that kind of price

 

[Willdon]

View attachment 2552594

1 min for 169 dollars and i bet it shows nothing

More like $200 they add 20% of what you buy

 

[HoleyMan]

It’ll be a topless vid, that’s it, no pussy on show, fair play to anyone that buys it, it’ll leak eventually

It’ll be a topless vid, that’s it, no pussy on show, fair play to anyone that buys it, it’ll leak eventually

Fully topless vid won't be bad but obviously for the price though you want something we've not seen before - I.e. SJD completely naked. Intriguing.

 

[ShimmyShimmy]

View attachment 2552594

1 min for 169 dollars and i bet it shows nothing

Has anyone seen any of these two vids yet? Has to be good for £170 each surely? What with SJd banging on about hottest content ever - though she has lied before about her content being no different than her Instagram stuff which as we all know ain't the case.

 

[Billieboy77]

Go fund page set up anywhere?

 

[DarkBLue12345]

Id expect at least pussy for that kind of price

I'd expect her to knock on my front door with her actually pussy for that.
She ain't ever gonna show us more than she is doing. She sees herself as an actress: uless she hits another dry spell

 

[headgear]

whats crazy is if she priced it reasonably eg 10-15 she'd sell loads of vids but instead she will sell only a very few - these girls really dont understand basic psychology, particularly equating 1 mins viewing to 160+ vat dollars