Rosie Jones

[thephoenix123]

 

[thephoenix123]

 

[thephoenix123]

 

[thephoenix123]

 

[Boobslover]

Some Page 3

 

[DarkBLue12345]

She's quite the Economist

 

[Fribbit]

View attachment 1918895
This one above is the first one I ever saw of her in June 2008! I was immediately hooked!

I know this one was her first ever page 3 appearance. Interesting that it says she was 17. I know the talk was that she'd shot for them on her 18th birthday but had also seen people wonder if she did anything before that. You say that was June 2008?

 

[Fribbit]

She turned 18 in July 2008. That particular one stood out to me at the time because I was also 17. I know the file name says about 25.07.08, but I remember it in June. I remember it well, I was just about to chuck the papers out when I looked who was on P3, and I was a fan instantly.

Yeh I knew she was a July birthday so you saying it was June made me wonder if that wasn't just a typo on The Sun's part and she really was doing Page 3 at 17.

 

[thephoenix123]

The most succulent tits....

 

[Fribbit]

Not the best quality pics since they're old but thought I'd share these

 

[Boobslover]

View attachment 1919085View attachment 1919086

Not the best quality pics since they're old but thought I'd share these

Loving the one with the pink bikini. I'd have a hard time concentrating on anything else if I saw that for real!

 

[Fribbit]

Loving the one with the pink bikini. I'd have a hard time concentrating on anything else if I saw that for real!

Here's a couple more of her in it

 

[Boobslover]

Here's a couple more of her in it


View attachment 1919140
View attachment 1919141

Even her off the clock holiday snaps are beautiful

 

[Rexthedog]

Yeh I knew she was a July birthday so you saying it was June made me wonder if that wasn't just a typo on The Sun's part and she really was doing Page 3 at 17.

Would that even have been legal?

 

[Fucjer]

16 for tits, 18 for fanny afaik?

I guess that the more serious papers go for 18 as it's a bit on the dodgy side to go lower than that

 

[Hosanah]

I remember way back in 2003 a 16 year old posed on Page 3. Maybe it's fine on the actual 18th year, regardless what side of the birthday

The Sport had a countdown to Lindsay Dawn MacKenzie's 16th Birthday, so that she could appear topless

 

[Beeblebrox]

Would that even have been legal?

With parental consent sure.

 

[Stuart76]

The law changed in 2003

 

[aboveandbeyond]

16 for tits, 18 for fanny afaik?

I guess that the more serious papers go for 18 as it's a bit on the dodgy side to go lower than that

You could do full frontal at 16, but not open leg or anything explicit, and of course, with parental consent. I remember LDM doing a set, I think in Whitehouse magazine, that was full nude. With regard to the photo of Rosie at 17, although legal at the time, this would now be considered illegal and should probably be deleted by the mods.

 

[Fribbit]

You could do full frontal at 16, but not open leg or anything explicit, and of course, with parental consent. I remember LDM doing a set, I think in Whitehouse magazine, that was full nude. With regard to the photo of Rosie at 17, although legal at the time, this would now be considered illegal and should probably be deleted by the mods.

I had looked up the news story the News In Briefs bit was commenting on (

You must be logged-in or registered for see links

) and it was from 24th July 2008. So I think she will have been 18 and it's just a typo by The Sun. I remember they kept getting Holly Peers' age wrong for a while.