Why are you posting a 5-year old article, as if it is "news"?So Emma says bath pics are not of her
You must be registered for see links
Have you just woken from a coma, I can’t think of another reason to bounce this thread?So Emma says bath pics are not of her
You must be registered for see links
First of all, this is ages old....So Emma says bath pics are not of her
You must be registered for see links
First of all, this is ages old....
Secondly, she can deny all she wants, they ARE her. If you look around a bit on the internet, the extreme no-lifers went full Sherlock Holmes on this one and found like 50 matching moles, the location where the video was shot and the fact that she was there at the time. Its definitely her, she denied it because it hardcore clashed with her image.
The only thing that was never "confirmed" was the red vibrator video in the mirror, even tho some moles seen there also fit her. Also, her lawyer took that thing down everywhere they could find at the time, which is also pretty indicative. But still, that one might actually not be her. The other ones tho, definitely.
Oh, was that actually confirmed? Where and when, cause what i remember is that it was never confirmed either way.I thought the vibrator was confirmed as Amanda Seyfried?
I'm not saying it isn't, but this is the translation to the caption and it's nothing to do with her being topless.View attachment 1337507 Can someone confirm if this one's real? Someone just posted it on a telegram group.
Which dildo video??Just shut up, it's real. Even the dildo video is real considering the background and they are her legs.
Just be quiet and try to understand the legal implications around publishing a fake as a national newspaper.
I'm done with this conversation.