Emma Watson Discussion Thread

[tm141]

Can someone ban this Troll kid? If what you said id true then why didn't the British press post or talk about Dutchess Kate's pussy pictures? They only posted the topless ones after a very long time. There's also an upskirt shot of Sarah Ferguson that non of the papers wanted to buy or publish.

 

[Troll]

Can someone ban this Troll kid? If what you said id true then why didn't the British press post or talk about Dutchess Kate's pussy pictures? They only posted the topless ones after a very long time. There's also an upskirt shot of Sarah Ferguson that non of the papers wanted to buy or publish.

Firstly, this thread was made to discuss the photo. I am only discussing the photo.
Secondly I post many pictures etc on this forum.
Thirdly, if you don't like to hear bad news then best stay away from this particular thread as you will only get upset like you are now.

I am not a specialist in the field , however I spoke with someone who is. They clarified to me the photo has 100% been doctored in some manner. That is not to say that she wasn't topless on that holiday, maybe she was, however that particular picture has been doctored. Maybe it was a genuine photo and the publishers tweaked it for sell-ability.

I must say your comment of media not reporting on 'upskirts' has absolutely no relevance. Sometimes they do, and if they don't its because the star is irrelevant or in bad taste aka (fergie and kate).
Emma Watson is not a royal, she is a has been actress but big enough to warrant some kind of write up even if a small paragraph if the photo was infact deemed genuine from any media outlet that got a copy of the photo. And believe me when I say they were all aware of the photo that was circulating.

Also I am unaware of the nonsense that Kate's photos were dropped much later, that is not true. When the french magazine dropped the mgazine it was over the papers the same day, and with some outrage.

I hoped the photo was real, but when you put all the variables together I think we get our answer.

 

[tm141]

Just shut up, it's real. Even the dildo video is real considering the background and they are her legs.

Just be quiet and try to understand the legal implications around publishing a fake as a national newspaper.

I'm done with this conversation.

 

[PeterW]

I am not a specialist in the field , however I spoke with someone who is

I'm literally a digital editor. The pixels are unaltered. It's real.

 

[Cuggie]

I'm with Troll on this one - the 'topless' holiday snap has been doctored.
I've run it through many freely-available fake-detector websites (those that allow adult-themed images anyway!) and they all report that the image has been photo-shopped.

 

[knightjk]

I fuckkin hate this thread

 

[nimbus21]

And yet here you are, hmmm.

 

[Troll]

I'm literally a digital editor. The pixels are unaltered. It's real.

With all due respect, the chap whom informed me it has been doctored is a 'Digital Forensics Analyst'.
Whilst not withstanding your credibility, I would take his view on board further in matters such as this.

 

[ro1and]

With all due respect, the chap whom informed me it has been doctored is a 'Digital Forensics Analyst'.
Whilst not withstanding your credibility, I would take his view on board further in matters such as this.

It’s the thing on the shoulder, among other things. Her face looks a bit off as well.
To be fair her tits are widely available in the see thru dress from her original leak so it’s not exactly urgent.

 

[PeterW]

With all due respect, the chap whom informed me it has been doctored is a 'Digital Forensics Analyst'.
Whilst not withstanding your credibility, I would take his view on board further in matters such as this.

And 'Digital Forensics Analyst's don't deal with photoshop, digital forensics is the science behind data and information in devices, the only thing he could tell you is meta data info which is irrelevant seeing as it's a scan from a magazine.

 

[tm141]

Obviously Emma heard about the publication and we have heard nothing about her suing the paper. Which is also news worthy news. She never sued them because the photos are real. End of.

 

[Kerni23]

And 'Digital Forensics Analyst's don't deal with photoshop, digital forensics is the science behind data and information in devices, the only thing he could tell you is meta data info which is irrelevant seeing as it's a scan from a magazine.

Anyone can say their great auntie Joyce has a PHD in pixelonomy and works for MI5 decoding stills of the 9/11 attacks for £120,000p/a. Like my auntie Joyce. She sellotapes 50p coins to my birthday cards bless her. She said its real.

 

[Troll]

And 'Digital Forensics Analyst's don't deal with photoshop, digital forensics is the science behind data and information in devices, the only thing he could tell you is meta data info which is irrelevant seeing as it's a scan from a magazine.

Clearly you do not work in the field. If you are making the assumption that a digital forensics analyst can not pick out a fake....

 

[Troll]

Obviously Emma heard about the publication and we have heard nothing about her suing the paper. Which is also news worthy news. She never sued them because the photos are real. End of.

I have seen maybe 1000 deep fakes of emma watson online, did she sue them also? #Logic

 

[Tyrion]

Clearly you do not work in the field. If you are making the assumption that a digital forensics analyst can not pick out a fake....

How about you show some proof if you are that adamant about it being fake. Just saying something doesn't convince anyone. Show clear proof where the picture has been altered - but this "my buddy is an expert therefore everyone should believe me" is nonesense.

 

[Hajimenoippo2017]

Clearly you do not work in the field. If you are making the assumption that a digital forensics analyst can not pick out a fake....

How'd we know hes even good at his job? all we have to go on is a known troll.

I have seen maybe 1000 deep fakes of emma watson online, did she sue them also? #Logic

And how many of them were printed and liable for legal actions? Yeah, none.

 

[PeterW]

Clearly you do not work in the field. If you are making the assumption that a digital forensics analyst can not pick out a fake....

Digital Forensics Analysts don't work in fields either, they work in an office. Get a grip, kid.

 

[Al-Capote]

Obviously Emma heard about the publication and we have heard nothing about her suing the paper. Which is also news worthy news. She never sued them because the photos are real. End of.

It is also possible that, by suing the paper, you'd bring more publicity around it. (After all, we are still talking about the Middleton's breasts, while it remained somewhat quiet when it was first published.) This paper is French, and I happen to be French too, and this went on mostly unnoticed. In fact, had it not been for this forum, I would have never heard of those photos.

 

[tm141]

Just a really bad Troll Troll lol.

 

[BigMac413612]

Y’all, just ignore the troll kid. They’re here for attention.