Gargoyle521
New Member
Hey, you’re all good. I appreciate your work. You do you. I just wanted to see if she was on your radar at all. Thank!
AI Generated Fake Celebrity Nudes (not deepnude/deepfake)
- Thread starter fudefrak
- Start date
Wasn't sure if I wanted to post this or not since she's not exactly a celebrity, but I did do a model for Cascina Caradonna. Youtuber/actress/musician, but most well known as being the face model for the character of Dina in The Last of Us 2. I'll put it in spoiler tags to avoid cluttering the thread.
Are this models available to download?
No, sorry
Hayley Williams
Honestly, this didn't turn out as well as I would have hoped. I probably needed more images to match the quality of some other the others, although I have done some models with similar number of pics that turned out better, so perhaps just with training more models and merging them together I can sort out some of the issues, but if not I do have some ideas to tweak my settings which shouldn't impact most celebrities with higher image counts, but may help a little for those with less. It's also just possible my dataset just may not have contained enough variety for the training to learn her face as well. It's nowhere near as bad as default Stable Diffusion, just not quite up to my standards. Although a few photos still looked pretty good.
View attachment 
Edit: Yeah, merging with a second model has seemed to improve the likeness quite a bit
Honestly, this didn't turn out as well as I would have hoped. I probably needed more images to match the quality of some other the others, although I have done some models with similar number of pics that turned out better, so perhaps just with training more models and merging them together I can sort out some of the issues, but if not I do have some ideas to tweak my settings which shouldn't impact most celebrities with higher image counts, but may help a little for those with less. It's also just possible my dataset just may not have contained enough variety for the training to learn her face as well. It's nowhere near as bad as default Stable Diffusion, just not quite up to my standards. Although a few photos still looked pretty good.
View attachment Edit: Yeah, merging with a second model has seemed to improve the likeness quite a bit
Last edited:
I was recreating my Emma Stone model yesterday after the recent issue that corrupted some of my models, and I thought the results were a little underwhelming, so I decided to make the change to my training settings that I was considering earlier while training the Hayley Williams model, and the results turned out to be really good. You can see the new images posted after the edit in the Emma Stone 2 post here.
Of course I'll be resetting my Emma Stone model again whenever high quality Poor Things screencaps come out anyway, lol, but this will still be useful for other new models I train, or further revisions on existing models.
Basically, I was modifying the number of training epochs based on the dataset size, with the idea that the more images in my dataset, the more blending of concepts start happening, so you shouldn't need as many epochs, as long as the total number of steps still increases. So basically, my training steps were calculated by the square root of the number of images, multiplied by a constant value of 2700, plus 5 epochs for warmup. So with 1396 images included in the dataset for Emma Stone (673 images of Emma and 723 nude/porn images) that was coming to 77 epochs. I think the main issue is that I use a polynomial learning rate scheduler, starting at a high learning rate and getting smaller and smaller each step, almost like an exponentially decaying learning rate, focusing on learning smaller and smaller details, to really get those precise details, and the problem is you don't get through as many epochs before the learning rate drops considerably if the total epochs is 77. So while the number of training steps total does increase with a bigger dataset, the number of epochs was decreasing by too much when datasets got too big. So I just went ahead and reset it to the more typical default of 100 epochs, with the first 5 epochs being the warmup, and the results were much better. 30% more training time (which can be hours) but it was worth it.
Of course I'll be resetting my Emma Stone model again whenever high quality Poor Things screencaps come out anyway, lol, but this will still be useful for other new models I train, or further revisions on existing models.
ishmael1978
New Member
Any chance of a re-up? Thanks in advance
dovifo6483
New Member
Hi buddy, I really loved this pics. I was hoping to know what u use to make this pics and how do u do it
I train my own models. I gather hundreds of images myself, manually crop them, and manually give each one a caption. In the case of Emma Watson, I ended up gathering over 700 images of her. Then I also have over 700 nude/porn images all manually cropped and captioned as well, so that the model not only gets better at learning the person, but also gets better at learning how to generate images of nudity and sex.
I train with dreambooth and my own custom settings, generating a full model for each celebrity. In between new celebrities I often train new iterations of the model and average them together as well, which helps eliminate some of the unnecessary weights in the model and focus more on the changes common to each iteration which creates a better performing model.
Hey mate, can you re-up this link?
