AI Generated Fake Celebrity Nudes (not deepnude/deepfake)

fudefrak

Well-Known Member
I've noticed something while setting up my datasets that has caused me to start over with some models. When I started I would just describe everything, be as detailed as possible, hoping that the more information I provide, the more concepts the AI can learn, and this is technically true, but if you don't plan to use as many words when prompting this can become an issue. Like, I would describe when an outfit was tight and was showing off the shape of their boobs or butt, but then I learned that the model did a poor job learning the shape of their body without including words like that in my prompt. Same thing for if I mentioned that an outfit showed cleavage, where some models were only learning the correct shape of their boobs when associated with the word cleavage, which I obviously wouldn't use when describing someone who is naked.

Another one I've noticed that it's a good idea not to describe is hair style, length, and color, UNLESS it's specifically in a style or color that you don't want the AI to ever automatically generate without you specifying it, like for example with Karen Gillan looking bald, or Katy Perry with short blonde hair, or Taylor Swift when she went platinum blonde. Personally, I didn't like those styles as much as their other looks, so I'd prefer for those styles to only be generated if I specifically mention them. So I've been going back through my datasets, trimming them down, and retraining models, and I think the results are better than they were before.

Rachel McAdams is a good example where I did both of these things. Especially with her hair, since she's often switched between blonde and brown hair, and some red, and so I've let the model learn all of those styles in context with her name, so that the model will decide which hairstyle to use when, based on the context of the rest of the picture, rather than needing to specify it myself, which I think is pretty cool.

By the way, for those wondering, my next model will be Emma Watson. I've gathered almost 200 images so far but still have a lot to go.

EDIT: Oh and another thing I learned to stop mentioning was if they were smiling, because then the generated images never had a smile unless I specified it. Now the models learn when it makes sense for them to smile or make other facial expressions, rather than needing to specify it
 
Last edited:

fudefrak

Well-Known Member
Emma Stone


00002-1717307148.png00003-1212267637.png00006-644011479.png00009-3253272738.png00009-3832812230.png00012-1340298666.png00013-2936927262.png00014-2519886627.png00017-4126485665.png00019-3635120808.png00011-1370435617.jpg

Edit: Made some modification to my training settings which seems to be producing much more impressive results (although can take considerably longer sometimes)

00030-2038900647.jpg00004-1804888975.jpg00046-1904255214.jpg00065-3517845445.jpg00017-3232282638.jpg00039-3237140029.jpg00049-2029995461.jpg00057-3710642640.jpg00000-3522552575.jpg00012-172245078.jpg00015-4124439329.jpg00023-1404150844.jpg00002-1820808197.jpg00014-3705786057.jpg00042-1328523829.jpg00059-898304670.jpg00029-365043545.jpg00020-3907763304.jpg00061-3158971129.jpg00034-696869070.jpg00068-2947440639.jpg00062-2983030343.jpg00055-3276880573.jpg00001-2860395417.png00003-1768590182.png00005-558127230.png00008-667104237.png00010-2584444916.png00016-2939885801.png00021-2875069282.png00024-1753311616.png00026-3880062872.png00028-1873508766.png00029-827314721.png00038-3239898063.png00013-3893345641.jpg

Retrained my Emma Stone model using images from Poor Things in the dataset, as well as some other improvements to the captioning of some images

00001-25804168.png00003-480589094.png00005-3969092813.png00007-1923413743.png00010-1919882222.png00012-2195363508.png00015-784500741.png00017-3117917877.png00018-509609189.png00022-4193987982.png00024-1603413331.png00028-218818058.png00031-1280777000.png00033-4161499721.png00035-2083506181.png00037-2065051347.png00041-2456598516.png00043-2810031218.png00045-927463272.png00046-1513061899.png00050-2570695570.png00051-2272902792.png00054-1772309445.png00058-861091312.png00001-2610973053.png00003-1269408413.png00005-2329036971.png00007-1223432663.png00009-1951406214.png00011-2747639433.png00018-3624396654.png00020-4159700495.png00021-4255078260.png00025-152869436.png00004-3348942821.png00005-4067531545.png00015-2766838074.png00018-849020964.png00001-2674147619.png00004-3339650002.png00005-23584664.png00006-2157390320.png00008-4171087178.png00011-2937769584.png00013-1930896393.png00015-3090722062.png00019-828720898.png00022-754730481.png00026-955218175.png
 
Last edited:

fudefrak

Well-Known Member
Can anyone do Lauren German. Have not see a decent deepfake job on her yet. Thanks
This isn't the thread for deepfake/deepnudes. There are other threads for that. This is for photos generated entirely with AI.

I'd say the post above yours looks like it doesn't belong here either, as it does look like a deepnude to me.
 

fudefrak

Well-Known Member
Would you prefer if I do my future posts like the one above, with the larger thumbnails? The smaller thumbnails often crop the images, but they don't take up as much room, so I'm not sure which is better
 
These are amazing! How did you make them? Is it using an app?
 

fudefrak

Well-Known Member
These are amazing! How did you make them? Is it using an app?
No, the AI models I use aren't public. I train my own models by finding hundreds of pictures of the celebrity, fitting each image to square dimensions either by cropping or by adding borders. I also have hundreds of images of naked women and various porn positions and did the same for those photos too. I run them through a training process using Dreambooth, which creates a custom AI model, specifically tuned to generate that particular celebrity. I often then repeat this process multiple times and average the models together to improve the accuracy over time, although I have recently restarted that process after making some changes to the captions in the dataset, so this particular Kate Beckinsale is two models merged together. In the past I've gone up to 6, and which each merge, the accuracy to their likeness tends to improve, but further models are especially important for certain types of images too, as one or two models merged together tend not to be as reliable for certain prompts.

I generate using the Stable Diffusion WebUI, using my own GPU. All of my models start with RealisticVision 5.1 as a base, but the final models I make are considerably better for the particular celebrity I'm focused on.

Can you please make some of Antonella Roccuzzo (Messi’s wife). She’s so underrated
I have a list of 507 celebrities that I choose from, by running a quick tournament by myself each time I'm ready to start grabbing more images. The whole process from grabbing the first image to generating the first model can potentially take weeks, depending on how many images I need to gather and how much free time I have each night. Right now I'm working on Emma Watson for my next model. I've gathered over 300 images so far, but it feels like there may still be a lot more I will be grabbing before I feel like I have everything I want from my sources.

Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with that person, or the ones requested by bleepedyblorpedy above, so I won't be adding them to my list right now, and even if I did, I'd probably never get to them because I have so many more people I'm interested in creating AI models for.
 
Last edited:
No, the AI models I use aren't public. I train my own models by finding hundreds of pictures of the celebrity, fitting each image to square dimensions either by cropping or by adding borders. I also have hundreds of images of naked woman and various porn positions and did the same for those photos too. I run them through a training process using Dreambooth, which creates a custom AI model, specifically tuned to generate that particular celebrity. I often then repeat this process multiple times and average the models together to improve the accuracy over time, although I have recently restarted that process after making some changes to the captions in the dataset, so this particular Kate Beckinsale is two models merged together. In the past I've gone up to 6, and which each merge, the accuracy to their likeness tends to improve, but further models are especially important for certain types of images too, as one or two models merged together tend not to be as reliable for certain prompts.

I generate using the Stable Diffusion WebUI, using my own GPU. All of my models start with RealisticVision 5.1 as a base, but the final models I make are considerably better for the particular celebrity I'm focused on.


I have a list of 507 celebrities that I choose from, by running a quick tournament by myself each time I'm ready to start grabbing more images. The whole process from grabbing the first image to generating the first model can potentially take weeks, depending on how many images I need to gather and how much free time I have each night. Right now I'm working on Emma Watson for my next model. I've gathered over 300 images so far, but it feels like there may still be a lot more I will be grabbing before I feel like I have everything I want from my sources.

Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with that person, or the ones requested by bleepedyblorpedy above, so I won't be adding them to my list right now, and even if I did, I'd probably never get to them because I have so many more people I'm interested in creating AI models for.
Okay understood. Are you able to add Dua Lipa or Hailey Bieber to the list if they’re not already on there?
 

JigglyMuffin

Active Member
No, the AI models I use aren't public. I train my own models by finding hundreds of pictures of the celebrity, fitting each image to square dimensions either by cropping or by adding borders. I also have hundreds of images of naked women and various porn positions and did the same for those photos too. I run them through a training process using Dreambooth, which creates a custom AI model, specifically tuned to generate that particular celebrity. I often then repeat this process multiple times and average the models together to improve the accuracy over time, although I have recently restarted that process after making some changes to the captions in the dataset, so this particular Kate Beckinsale is two models merged together. In the past I've gone up to 6, and which each merge, the accuracy to their likeness tends to improve, but further models are especially important for certain types of images too, as one or two models merged together tend not to be as reliable for certain prompts.

I generate using the Stable Diffusion WebUI, using my own GPU. All of my models start with RealisticVision 5.1 as a base, but the final models I make are considerably better for the particular celebrity I'm focused on.


I have a list of 507 celebrities that I choose from, by running a quick tournament by myself each time I'm ready to start grabbing more images. The whole process from grabbing the first image to generating the first model can potentially take weeks, depending on how many images I need to gather and how much free time I have each night. Right now I'm working on Emma Watson for my next model. I've gathered over 300 images so far, but it feels like there may still be a lot more I will be grabbing before I feel like I have everything I want from my sources.

Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with that person, or the ones requested by bleepedyblorpedy above, so I won't be adding them to my list right now, and even if I did, I'd probably never get to them because I have so many more people I'm interested in creating AI models for.
quite the process, how well does it fare with multiple celebs at once. to generate group pictures?
 

Preacher

You’re not wrong
Staff member
No, the AI models I use aren't public. I train my own models by finding hundreds of pictures of the celebrity, fitting each image to square dimensions either by cropping or by adding borders. I also have hundreds of images of naked women and various porn positions and did the same for those photos too. I run them through a training process using Dreambooth, which creates a custom AI model, specifically tuned to generate that particular celebrity. I often then repeat this process multiple times and average the models together to improve the accuracy over time, although I have recently restarted that process after making some changes to the captions in the dataset, so this particular Kate Beckinsale is two models merged together. In the past I've gone up to 6, and which each merge, the accuracy to their likeness tends to improve, but further models are especially important for certain types of images too, as one or two models merged together tend not to be as reliable for certain prompts.

I generate using the Stable Diffusion WebUI, using my own GPU. All of my models start with RealisticVision 5.1 as a base, but the final models I make are considerably better for the particular celebrity I'm focused on.


I have a list of 507 celebrities that I choose from, by running a quick tournament by myself each time I'm ready to start grabbing more images. The whole process from grabbing the first image to generating the first model can potentially take weeks, depending on how many images I need to gather and how much free time I have each night. Right now I'm working on Emma Watson for my next model. I've gathered over 300 images so far, but it feels like there may still be a lot more I will be grabbing before I feel like I have everything I want from my sources.

Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with that person, or the ones requested by bleepedyblorpedy above, so I won't be adding them to my list right now, and even if I did, I'd probably never get to them because I have so many more people I'm interested in creating AI models for.
Wow, that’s some dedication! So at what point did your hobby become your job and your job become your hobby;)
 

fudefrak

Well-Known Member
Wow, that’s some dedication! So at what point did your hobby become your job and your job become your hobby;)
I only gather about 25 images a night, and only if I have enough free time. I train models while I sleep, and I generate new nudes in the background while I'm doing my "nightly browsing" each night, so overall it doesn't take too much out of my time. I had more than usual of Kate Beckinsale in the above post because I was also generating some while the Game Awards were on last night lol, so that added a lot more generation time.

quite the process, how well does it fare with multiple celebs at once. to generate group pictures?
In general, I find that stable diffusion models have a hard time generating more than one woman in the same picture, unless they are of a different race. If you try, you either get the same woman copied, or you get a blend between the two women. Man and woman though, you can do with some success, although I have seen some blending of features there too. Since combining two women in one image is difficult to do, I tend not to train different women into the same model for that reason. Just focus the model on being really good at doing one celebrity.

The best way I can include two different women is by taking two different trained models, merging them together, and using a prompt with both their names in it to generate an image with two women in it. Both of these women will appear to look like a merge between the two women, but one will look a little closer to one of them, and the other will look a little closer to the other. I then use inpainting to replace each woman with the one I think looks closest, using the original individually trained models. I tend not to do this very often because these take significantly more work, but here's one example I did with Kristen Bell and Mila Kunis together:

View attachment
 

SDMASTER

Well-Known Member
Daisy Ridley
00205-1423911936.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 00184-1803646760.jpg
    00184-1803646760.jpg
    615.7 KB · Views: 184
  • 00193-1423911924.jpg
    00193-1423911924.jpg
    635.7 KB · Views: 179
  • 00195-1423911926.jpg
    00195-1423911926.jpg
    634.9 KB · Views: 193
  • 00200-1423911931.jpg
    00200-1423911931.jpg
    608.6 KB · Views: 188
  • 00202-1423911933.jpg
    00202-1423911933.jpg
    623.9 KB · Views: 166
  • 00211-1423911942.jpg
    00211-1423911942.jpg
    601.4 KB · Views: 169
  • 00222-1953352807.jpg
    00222-1953352807.jpg
    564 KB · Views: 178
  • 00228-1094433764.jpg
    00228-1094433764.jpg
    587.1 KB · Views: 192
Top