The SJD comments page

Abarth69

Abarth69

Well-Known Member
Compared to other 'models' and babestation girls you do get at least a couple of pics a day and a daily ppv. Yes I know the prices vary but you would do well to get one put a week for a tenner a month for some well known models.
Yes I do sub and buy random ppvs but it's my money and my choice
 
M

MrSausage

Member
Abarth69 said:
Compared to other 'models' and babestation girls you do get at least a couple of pics a day and a daily ppv. Yes I know the prices vary but you would do well to get one put a week for a tenner a month for some well known models.
Yes I do sub and buy random ppvs but it's my money and my choice
Click to expand...
I don’t think anyone doubts your right to spend money as you please, it’s just, here’s the best analogy I can come up with, see what you think, I’m genuinely be interested to know your reaction:

You remember the lads mags of old, FHM, Zoo, Nuts? They were a £5 tops, had 4 or 5 models and D list actresses and singers in their undies and occasionally you’d get a nip. Read the funnies and the sports articles if you like….

Then there’s porn and glamour sites like OT, hundreds of models about 20% of which were stunners across 5 different sites for £40 tops. Pick yer faves. Have access to 0000s pics which you could save. Occasionally get a bit of vag, accidental or otherwise.

Now look at the OF model: £12 for access. A pic, maybe two a day of Zoo quality OF JUST THE ONE MODEL. If you want to follow another that’s another £12 and another and another. And let’s be clear they still want you to spend on the other models too from the collabs and referrals. So quickly this spirals into hundreds. Then you get a PPV, that’s another £20 and as they know what they’re doing, you have no idea what you’re going to see, could be a tit could be more undies but ultimately we’re all like Jason Biggs at the start of American Pie high fiving ourselves going, “yesss!!! That is a tit!” at the slightest hint of nipple. And her ladyship talks about taking back control. Well, too fucking right…. It’s knackered the glamour photography business but arguably isn’t it hijacking every mans wallet as well? Compared to what you used to pay for FHM or OT, we are getting fucking fleeced. You can sometime pay £20 on a PPV for the same level of pics on her main feed! Back to FHM - a fiver and all those pics were together!!! AND YOU CANT EVEN SAVE THEM (well, unless you know a trick).

And while I cannot understand how people can see this as fair value, I am ultimately in the wrong as these models are making a bajillion out of it. Literally if I was a hot chick and not a fat dude in his 40s I’d do it like a shot. Spend my life in a stuffy office working for the man when I can send you a photo of me in some lace kecks for £20 and rack in £20k a month? I should coco. Get rich quick schemes don’t exist, except they do with OF as every punter is a sucker. Sex sells and how!

Now, a counter argument could be “well, model X is now pushing her levels which she wasn’t before” agreed. However….. before OF, models were starting to get desperate. We only have to look at LAB to see a former glamour star turning into a cam girl ready to get her flaps out. OF didn’t make her a success, it saved her! I’d vouch that if anything, OF just took the power from our hands and put a premium on things. The glamour models were always going to age and get desperate, this just gave them an opportunity to charge double.

Of course it’s your cash, but let’s all just renember, that while we’re being fleeced for a picture of a gusset, if you can tell me where the value is in this exchange compared to Zoo and OT, I’d be glad to understand.
 
Namecaller

Namecaller

Well-Known Member
MrSausage said:
And while I cannot understand how people can see this as fair value, I am ultimately in the wrong as these models are making a bajillion out of it. Literally if I was a hot chick and not a fat dude in his 40s I’d do it like a shot. Spend my life in a stuffy office working for the man when I can send you a photo of me in some lace kecks for £20 and rack in £20k a month? I should coco. Get rich quick schemes don’t exist, except they do with OF as every punter is a sucker. Sex sells and how!
Click to expand...
i'm still in, so long as you give good value for money for at least one whole month....? ;)
 
M

MCGCapital

Member
MrSausage said:
I don’t think anyone doubts your right to spend money as you please, it’s just, here’s the best analogy I can come up with, see what you think, I’m genuinely be interested to know your reaction:

You remember the lads mags of old, FHM, Zoo, Nuts? They were a £5 tops, had 4 or 5 models and D list actresses and singers in their undies and occasionally you’d get a nip. Read the funnies and the sports articles if you like….

Then there’s porn and glamour sites like OT, hundreds of models about 20% of which were stunners across 5 different sites for £40 tops. Pick yer faves. Have access to 0000s pics which you could save. Occasionally get a bit of vag, accidental or otherwise.

Now look at the OF model: £12 for access. A pic, maybe two a day of Zoo quality OF JUST THE ONE MODEL. If you want to follow another that’s another £12 and another and another. And let’s be clear they still want you to spend on the other models too from the collabs and referrals. So quickly this spirals into hundreds. Then you get a PPV, that’s another £20 and as they know what they’re doing, you have no idea what you’re going to see, could be a tit could be more undies but ultimately we’re all like Jason Biggs at the start of American Pie high fiving ourselves going, “yesss!!! That is a tit!” at the slightest hint of nipple. And her ladyship talks about taking back control. Well, too fucking right…. It’s knackered the glamour photography business but arguably isn’t it hijacking every mans wallet as well? Compared to what you used to pay for FHM or OT, we are getting fucking fleeced. You can sometime pay £20 on a PPV for the same level of pics on her main feed! Back to FHM - a fiver and all those pics were together!!! AND YOU CANT EVEN SAVE THEM (well, unless you know a trick).

And while I cannot understand how people can see this as fair value, I am ultimately in the wrong as these models are making a bajillion out of it. Literally if I was a hot chick and not a fat dude in his 40s I’d do it like a shot. Spend my life in a stuffy office working for the man when I can send you a photo of me in some lace kecks for £20 and rack in £20k a month? I should coco. Get rich quick schemes don’t exist, except they do with OF as every punter is a sucker. Sex sells and how!

Now, a counter argument could be “well, model X is now pushing her levels which she wasn’t before” agreed. However….. before OF, models were starting to get desperate. We only have to look at LAB to see a former glamour star turning into a cam girl ready to get her flaps out. OF didn’t make her a success, it saved her! I’d vouch that if anything, OF just took the power from our hands and put a premium on things. The glamour models were always going to age and get desperate, this just gave them an opportunity to charge double.

Of course it’s your cash, but let’s all just renember, that while we’re being fleeced for a picture of a gusset, if you can tell me where the value is in this exchange compared to Zoo and OT, I’d be glad to understand.
Click to expand...
It definitely was easier to budget as a punter pre onlyfans, you could treat yourself to a sub for a porn site and download the content you want, then change to a different site the month after all for about 30 quid pre only fans.

As you say, now you’re expected to pay 30 quid just for one of them for a sub and a PPV, it’s pretty rubbish value. Then it’s easy to get drawn in to doing it for half a dozen girls and before you know it you’ve spent 200-300. There must be guys who are addicted to it and spending way beyond their means which is sad.

Personally I think it’s just a craze, a bit like how online dating was class back when tinder first came out. Once they ruined it by being greedy and trying to make you upgrade for everything it lost its appeal and the experience on there wasn’t as good. These hoes on OFs are experiencing a golden age and in a few years it will be harder for them to get subs I reckon. Although the male sex drive is strong so there’ll always be a market for it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N Ella MAFs Homophobic comments = instant ban Celebrity Sexy Photos 44
S Help! Can't post comments on blog Suggestions on blog and forum 1
Similar threads
Ella MAFs Homophobic comments = instant ban
Help! Can't post comments on blog
Top