Jo Guest

Welshgeek

Well-Known Member
If you were the men in those shoots, you would have done your best to edge it in ever so slightly, and maybe she would have consented, and photographers would have been trigger happy snapping away....

The negatives will be in someone's drawer never to see the light of day
 

Slaterman

Well-Known Member
so how do you know, are you in the industry ? have you met those that did the shoots with her. why so angry ? you say an inch... an inch is pretty large distance and even in those soft core teaser shots... she was def less than an inch... im saying that there was more than those pictures, the photographer did the usual soft core for those markets that took soft core ,then the tease poses, that handling erections and posed oral and such in at tease format and then the harder poses, each had a price, no one wanted those hard core shots... so were not used. but the others were. if there had been more interest then im pretty sure we would have seen the harder poses. maybe they still exist in some private collection maybe not. but they were done. thats for sure. but were all entitled to our own views on it.
Btw an inch is the difference between ooohhhhhh and aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh, just saying like....
 

Hornyscot

Well-Known Member
your argument falls flat the second you wrote that noone wanted her hardcore shots. you think that with the career she had that they wouldn't have been worth a small fortune to someone, then would no doubt have gotten out into the public domain; just like with every other model who posed for similar shots? a lot of those models of the same era and just before were promised that their full frontal 'continental' shots would never be seen by the uk market, but then the internet came along and bang..... sam fox pussy, linda lusardi pussy, jayne marconi/middlemiss pussy..... so jo guest full on porn shots would also have gotten out there by now. just my theory. no capitals, no shouting, no issues with opposing views.
do you actually know how it works.... tog does a few sets, those are bundled in strength and price, the soft sets then the middle sets, again these were done as the porn laws in the states around that time were confusing... the biggest market... on what and where mags could be sold with content... this was way before the internet took off... it doesnt happen how you think it happens... or hope that it happens... there are some of us out here that saw some of the material. and can vouch etc. anyways can say what i saw and no one believe... it really doesnt matter in the grand scheme of things does it. its in the past. everyone has moved on. even if the good lady came on and said one way or another it doesnt matter, its a pity as she was stunning in her heyday. absolute darling with a great attitude.
 

Namecaller

Well-Known Member
do you actually know how it works.... tog does a few sets, those are bundled in strength and price, the soft sets then the middle sets, again these were done as the porn laws in the states around that time were confusing... the biggest market... on what and where mags could be sold with content... this was way before the internet took off... it doesnt happen how you think it happens... or hope that it happens... there are some of us out here that saw some of the material. and can vouch etc. anyways can say what i saw and no one believe... it really doesnt matter in the grand scheme of things does it. its in the past. everyone has moved on. even if the good lady came on and said one way or another it doesnt matter, its a pity as she was stunning in her heyday. absolute darling with a great attitude.
actually, i do know how it works, i was in the industry at the time of all this going on. but like you say, no pix means no proof either way. the end.
 

snooperman

Well-Known Member
I thought IP law gave her her own legal rights to her image being used, no?
In the UK all rights of ownership belong to the photographer ( Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988), they may wave those rights to individuals for fair use or shared release but normally the subject of the photos has no legal rights to them.
 

Hornyscot

Well-Known Member
In the UK all rights of ownership belong to the photographer ( Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988), they may wave those rights to individuals for fair use or shared release but normally the subject of the photos has no legal rights to them.
if nothing is signed.... which tended to be the case, however if the model was savvy they would get a release form signed etc. these days unless you have the full model details then you cant publish. so a release has to be in place.
 

Growbag84

Well-Known Member
A few more Mature pic, wish I could find the full sets.
 

Attachments

  • 7750bf307917786.JPG
    7750bf307917786.JPG
    377 KB · Views: 688
  • 1c3d4a307917844.JPG
    1c3d4a307917844.JPG
    406.6 KB · Views: 710
  • 981033307917823.JPG
    981033307917823.JPG
    401.2 KB · Views: 637
  • 50bf6c391973754.JPG
    50bf6c391973754.JPG
    238.3 KB · Views: 674
  • 60b768391973738.JPG
    60b768391973738.JPG
    151.2 KB · Views: 694
  • 145157359_3_122_576lo.jpg
    145157359_3_122_576lo.jpg
    184.7 KB · Views: 718

Growbag84

Well-Known Member
Not seen this one posted.
 

Attachments

  • 30798_24_123_114lo.jpg
    30798_24_123_114lo.jpg
    344.4 KB · Views: 2,084
  • 30738_22_123_124lo.jpg
    30738_22_123_124lo.jpg
    428.6 KB · Views: 2,081
  • 30722_20_123_8lo.jpg
    30722_20_123_8lo.jpg
    370.6 KB · Views: 1,677
  • 30709_19_123_84lo.jpg
    30709_19_123_84lo.jpg
    368.6 KB · Views: 1,409
  • 30699_18_123_134lo.jpg
    30699_18_123_134lo.jpg
    429.7 KB · Views: 1,443
  • 30667_15_123_934lo.jpg
    30667_15_123_934lo.jpg
    390.5 KB · Views: 1,226
  • 30583_7_123_52lo.jpg
    30583_7_123_52lo.jpg
    414.8 KB · Views: 1,027
  • 30572_6_123_201lo.jpg
    30572_6_123_201lo.jpg
    446.1 KB · Views: 931
  • 30533_2_123_169lo.jpg
    30533_2_123_169lo.jpg
    464.3 KB · Views: 898
  • 30554_4_123_61lo.jpg
    30554_4_123_61lo.jpg
    373.7 KB · Views: 932
  • 30524_1_123_9lo.jpg
    30524_1_123_9lo.jpg
    270.6 KB · Views: 1,341
Top