I only gather about 25 images a night, and only if I have enough free time. I train models while I sleep, and I generate new nudes in the background while I'm doing my "nightly browsing" each night, so overall it doesn't take too much out of my time. I had more than usual of Kate Beckinsale in the above post because I was also generating some while the Game Awards were on last night lol, so that added a lot more generation time.Wow, that’s some dedication! So at what point did your hobby become your job and your job become your hobby![]()
In general, I find that stable diffusion models have a hard time generating more than one woman in the same picture, unless they are of a different race. If you try, you either get the same woman copied, or you get a blend between the two women. Man and woman though, you can do with some success, although I have seen some blending of features there too. Since combining two women in one image is difficult to do, I tend not to train different women into the same model for that reason. Just focus the model on being really good at doing one celebrity.quite the process, how well does it fare with multiple celebs at once. to generate group pictures?
The best way I can include two different women is by taking two different trained models, merging them together, and using a prompt with both their names in it to generate an image with two women in it. Both of these women will appear to look like a merge between the two women, but one will look a little closer to one of them, and the other will look a little closer to the other. I then use inpainting to replace each woman with the one I think looks closest, using the original individually trained models. I tend not to do this very often because these take significantly more work, but here's one example I did with Kristen Bell and Mila Kunis together:
View attachment





































