OnlyFans $@4@h J@yn£

H

HoleyMan

Well-Known Member
reddyteddy said:
I might be wrong...I stand to be corrected...I have it in my head that this pic was £200...anyone confirm?? I'd want to see the nips for that
Click to expand...
I think it was that price for the set of 9 of which her self confessed fully topless shoot was included within. The blur on the pic I really hope hasn't misled.
 
B

Baziscrazy

Well-Known Member
HoleyMan said:
I think it was that price for the set of 9 of which her self confessed fully topless shoot was included within. The blur on the pic I really hope hasn't misled.
Click to expand...
Probably had nipple tassles on. Otherwise we'd have seen it by now. Just another tease no doubt
 
F

fresh

Well-Known Member
The Sun, who have bigged her up since her OF move, done a where did it all go wrong article saying there's a pressure for SJD to keep her numbers up by doing more provocative content. Now this can be interpreted two ways 1. It's her hint hint wink wink via the media that she will be showing more on OF or Subs or 2. The beginning of the end. An interview a few years ago said she wouldn't rule out full nudity but wont do explicit. It's make or break time then probably - she seems to love taking her clothes off so hope she dives into full frontal to get those numbers up.Screenshot_20251021-172606~2.pngScreenshot_20251021-172540~2.png
 
N

Nobackdoors

Well-Known Member
fresh said:
The Sun, who have bigged her up since her OF move, done a where did it all go wrong article saying there's a pressure for SJD to keep her numbers up by doing more provocative content. Now this can be interpreted two ways 1. It's her hint hint wink wink via the media that she will be showing more on OF or Subs or 2. The beginning of the end. An interview a few years ago said she wouldn't rule out full nudity but wont do explicit. It's make or break time then probably - she seems to love taking her clothes off so hope she dives into full frontal to get those numbers up.View attachment 3174278View attachment 3174279
Click to expand...
I think she was hoping that by now she’d have made enough from OF and have gotten offers for tv work and be able to walk away from doing content. She did seem to be pushing it with lots of interviews etc. if she has any sense she will keep getting her kit off and get her retirement money in.
 
P

pompey76

Well-Known Member
fresh said:
The Sun, who have bigged her up since her OF move, done a where did it all go wrong article saying there's a pressure for SJD to keep her numbers up by doing more provocative content. Now this can be interpreted two ways 1. It's her hint hint wink wink via the media that she will be showing more on OF or Subs or 2. The beginning of the end. An interview a few years ago said she wouldn't rule out full nudity but wont do explicit. It's make or break time then probably - she seems to love taking her clothes off so hope she dives into full frontal to get those numbers up.View attachment 3174278View attachment 3174279
Click to expand...
It's the sun, so you can probably safely just wipe your ass with it... if anything, the story is probably planted to make people think she's likely to be more riskier than before. It's basically to say, "hey, sign up, she's about to get her kit off completely"
 
F

fresh

Well-Known Member
pompey76 said:
It's the sun, so you can probably safely just wipe your ass with it... if anything, the story is probably planted to make people think she's likely to be more riskier than before. It's basically to say, "hey, sign up, she's about to get her kit off completely"
Click to expand...
Indeed and the article said pals are worried about how far she'll go. I think that could be a brace yourself hint she may have to go totally naked to get those subscribers back. The article seems to hint that she's almost getting forced into that. Watch this space I guess.
 
Ironman

Ironman

Well-Known Member
fresh said:
Indeed and the article said pals are worried about how far she'll go. I think that could be a brace yourself hint she may have to go totally naked to get those subscribers back. The article seems to hint that she's almost getting forced into that. Watch this space I guess.
Click to expand...
Never gonna happen, she has actually gone backwards over the last year or so - just rehashing the same lingerie, hand boob and occasional nip slip...
Which is fine of course if that's all you expect

She has her loyal fans who hang around hoping for more so has a steady income for now, popping up on chat shows now and then to plug how 'empowering' she is being etc but will never go further sadly....
 
P

pompey76

Well-Known Member
fresh said:
Indeed and the article said pals are worried about how far she'll go. I think that could be a brace yourself hint she may have to go totally naked to get those subscribers back. The article seems to hint that she's almost getting forced into that. Watch this space I guess.
Click to expand...
When any newspaper says pals, or a source, or "friends of", it's basically something they have to put because they can't very well put, "idle conjecture says", or "my brain is telling me this is what people think", or "we don't really know but this is what our mate dave down the pub had to say about it"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top