Emma Watson Discussion Thread

Plate555

New Member
The only thing i wondering is it The masturbating video with dildo real Emma Watson?
What about The bath leaks, those nipples are exacly The same as new leaks, also golden reckle on her hand, so are the bath leaks real emma
I'd also like some scientists here to put together a nice collage verifying Emma's dildo video. Maybe pics and video;)
 

Joyconboyz

Well-Known Member
The only thing i wondering is it The masturbating video with dildo real Emma Watson?
What about The bath leaks, those nipples are exacly The same as new leaks, also golden reckle on her hand, so are the bath leaks real emma

We had a thread discussing the vibrator vid and Emma's lawyers issued a DMCA takedown. I am of the belief that the vibrator vid is the genuine article! Unfortunately its not higher quality and longer.
 

Joyconboyz

Well-Known Member
The only thing i wondering is it The masturbating video with dildo real Emma Watson?
What about The bath leaks, those nipples are exacly The same as new leaks, also golden reckle on her hand, so are the bath leaks real emma
The bath video was proven to be her ages ago. One of the photos from that set had GPS metadata and it was taken from a location only she would have access to. I don't suggest anyone post that here because that probably falls under doxing. Rest assured the bath photos and video are absolutely her.
 
We had a thread discussing the vibrator vid and Emma's lawyers issued a DMCA takedown. I am of the belief that the vibrator vid is the genuine article! Unfortunately its not higher quality and l

The bath video was proven to be her ages ago. One of the photos from that set had GPS metadata and it was taken from a location only she would have access to. I don't suggest anyone post that here because that probably falls under doxing. Rest assured the bath photos and video are absolutely her.
Thank you for this information, is it possible to find the proof of GPS metadata, where is this information came from, I would like to see that proof, where I can find it, thank you,
 

Daftandyboy

Well-Known Member
Thank you for this information, is it possible to find the proof of GPS metadata, where is this information came from, I would like to see that proof, where I can find it, thank you,
Stalker alert
But I remember the original set of images, when viewed on my ipad, came up with the GPS location also. Long since deleted now though.
 

Cuggie

Well-Known Member
Thank you for this information, is it possible to find the proof of GPS metadata, where is this information came from, I would like to see that proof, where I can find it, thank you,
I wouldn't call it proof, as EXIF/metadata can be manipulated and changed.
As for the 'masturbation video' - it has actually been discussed to death, with various names attributed - but the simple conclusion is that it could be anyone and is most likely a 'random' woman.
The bath vid may well be her but again, can't be definitively proven - I'm in the sceptical camp!
 

Manti

Member
I wouldn't call it proof, as EXIF/metadata can be manipulated and changed.
As for the 'masturbation video' - it has actually been discussed to death, with various names attributed - but the simple conclusion is that it could be anyone and is most likely a 'random' woman.
The bath vid may well be her but again, can't be definitively proven - I'm in the sceptical camp!
Nah, at least the bath vids are her, the internet went full sherlock-holmes on that.
They found like 50 matching moles, the fact that she owns a necklace and a bracelet like the ones in the videos, and that she was at the place during the time they were taken, according to the metadata. They are as confirmed as they can be without her straight up admitting its her.
The vibrator vid is more shaky - could in theory be anyone, but there are enough things indicating that its her to make it somewhat believable.
It came out exactly together with the bathtub stuff, it was IMMEDIATLY taken down everywhere as soon as it was uploaded, even faster than the bathtub stuff, at least some similar moles are visible with colour grading, and then they even hit the thread in this forum with a DMCA takedown.
 

Shoestring

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't call it proof, as EXIF/metadata can be manipulated and changed.
As for the 'masturbation video' - it has actually been discussed to death, with various names attributed - but the simple conclusion is that it could be anyone and is most likely a 'random' woman.
The bath vid may well be her but again, can't be definitively proven - I'm in the sceptical camp!
But it's harder to disprove it. There are more points in favour than against. But that killer point, her face is absent so the doubt will always exist.
 
I wouldn't call it proof, as EXIF/metadata can be manipulated and changed.
As for the 'masturbation video' - it has actually been discussed to death, with various names attributed - but the simple conclusion is that it could be anyone and is most likely a 'random' woman.
The bath vid may well be her but again, can't be definitively proven - I'm in the sceptical camp!
Thanks for letting me know, but what about the golden bracelet on her hand in the bath? She had the same golden bracelet on the airport in NYC and I think it would be pretty hard to Photoshop it because it's a video. I think yes the birthmark on her belly could be faked but I think there's a lot of details and it would be pretty hard to Photoshop all these details.
 

Joyconboyz

Well-Known Member
I am going to suggest that we don't post the GPS metadata on this thread. This thread will be a target for DMCA takedown if that information is here.
 
Nah, at least the bath vids are her, the internet went full sherlock-holmes on that.
They found like 50 matching moles, the fact that she owns a necklace and a bracelet like the ones in the videos, and that she was at the place during the time they were taken, according to the metadata. They are as confirmed as they can be without her straight up admitting its her.
The vibrator vid is more shaky - could in theory be anyone, but there are enough things indicating that its her to make it somewhat believable.
It came out exactly together with the bathtub stuff, it was IMMEDIATLY taken down everywhere as soon as it was uploaded, even faster than the bathtub stuff, at least some similar moles are visible with colour grading, and then they even hit the thread in this forum with a DMCA takedown.
I think even nipples from the beach in ibiza are the same as nipples in bath or at least if you look closer these nipples are very similar.
 

setho10

Member
What the DMCA actually means, how is this proof?
The DMCA is an American law that details how to manage copyright claims on the internet. The reason it is proof is because if the video wasn’t in fact her then she would have no copyright over it. Of course she could make the claim regardless, knowing that a small site like this won’t have the legal resources to fight it, but to my knowledge that is not a common tactic.
 
The DMCA is an American law that details how to manage copyright claims on the internet. The reason it is proof is because if the video wasn’t in fact her then she would have no copyright over it. Of course she could make the claim regardless, knowing that a small site like this won’t have the legal resources to fight it, but to my knowledge that is not a common tactic.
Thank you for explain.
 
Top