B/station 66 etc NO REAL NAMES IF IGNORED INSTANT BAN

jcpenny

Well-Known Member
Thanks for sharing! I personally don't see any problems with the filters in these videos. They appear clear and of high quality to me. Unlike some Snapchat videos that can make girls unrecognizable or be grainy and blurry, these videos seem to be very detailed. Cheers
that's fair enough but please compare hm's smeary stuff to these two samples from mm and kk. Actual definition, detail, resolution, minimum filters. hm doesn't come close. If you're paying £30 to £150 and up, you should get good quality.


vlcsnap-2023-07-10-23h20m30s190.png
 

Newboy123

Well-Known Member
that's fair enough but please compare hm's smeary stuff to these two samples from mm and kk. Actual definition, detail, resolution, minimum filters. hm doesn't come close. If you're paying £30 to £150 and up, you should get good quality.


View attachment 1990977

I know you were using that as an example but don’t suppose you have any more MM vids ?
 

andyshaw

Well-Known Member
I need to go to bed, I can upload some tomorrow! Quick one from MM, and once again, show me a video from flappers or hm with anything near this picture quality!


I can definitely see the comparison but I was pleasantly surprised by hm vids, as I expected them to be shockingly awful based on your comments but for me they are still watchable and can clearly see certain body parts unlike Low-res Lori! MM does have very high quality content but is also known for scamming and her vid descriptions are often misleading in my experience. I'm curious about recent offerings, but unsure if it's worth purchasing anything at all these days!
 
Top