B/station 66 etc NO REAL NAMES IF IGNORED INSTANT BAN

[johnboy2k22]

I hate myself. I’ve spent over £1.5k on flappers since cockdown.

go with god my son

 

[Harry82]

Anyone got anything of Charlie C

 

[gdz2]

…quickly moving onto her second today, collabing in Vegas with Nickmarxxpov.

She’s not wasting any time is she. Her LA trip was basically an open invitation to anyone who wants to fuck her on camera. Interesting too how happy she is to retweet her porn scenes on Twitter. At this rate She’ll be taking it in the ass and getting double penetrated before we even reach the new football season

Yeah. That quote about been the next Jenna Jameson wasn’t a joke. She’s taking every cock on her road. Following a lot of black pornstars and well known performers.

 

[andyshaw]

Oil painting video quality + DRM. Good luck to those who pay money for her vids

I'm a bit confused about the video quality you keep mentioning. From what I saw on her page all videos were in high definition. If they're as bad as you say, how is she making thousands of dollars per video? Her recent campaign earned over $6000 in tips, which is quite impressive. I've been tempted into buying some of her new content but if the quality is truly poor as you claim, I might reconsider. I'm just curious what motivates people to keep spending on her if that's the case. It all seems a bit odd to me?

 

[jcpenny]

I'm a bit confused about the video quality you keep mentioning. From what I saw on her page all videos were in high definition. If they're as bad as you say, how is she making thousands of dollars per video? Her recent campaign earned over $6000 in tips, which is quite impressive. I've been tempted into buying some of her new content but if the quality is truly poor as you claim, I might reconsider. I'm just curious what motivates people to keep spending on her if that's the case. It all seems a bit odd to me?

Most people are retarded or blinded by simping. it's not about whether it's HD or not, it's the video filters she uses.

 

[mattyjj]

The video's I've witnessed with this new DRM seem to all freeze at some point and take various attempts to load for it to play properly in high quality. As soon as someone I subscribe to enforces this I stop purchasing their videos, simply.

There's only 3 or 4 girls left that I really like who don't have it... yet.

Same for me, 1 device I use the videos don't even play so I know if a girl is using DRM. I've just not bothered with girls that have it turned on apart from 1 who I told about it and she turned it off. Seems like if they turn it off the videos they uploaded when it was turned on start working normally again.

 

[jcpenny]

Any random video from LAB, MikB or GD, are like getting a new pair of lenses in comparison.

 

[andyshaw]

Most people are retarded or blinded by simping. it's not about whether it's HD or not, it's the video filters she uses.

Ok got it, thanks for sharing. I'm still curious why you choose to financially support someone you criticize, unless you consider yourself a "retard" or a "simp" What motivates you (and others) to continually pay for her "low quality" content? It seems like many must not be bothered by the filters considering the amounts she's making...

I've noticed the same pattern with Lori. Despite numerous complaints about low-quality videos, there are still several people paying to access them. I'm just curious about the reasons behind this.

 

[jcpenny]

Ok got it, thanks for sharing. I'm still curious why you choose to financially support someone you criticize, unless you consider yourself a "retard" or a "simp" What motivates you (and others) to continually pay for her "low quality" content? It seems like many must not be bothered by the filters considering the amounts she's making...

I haven’t bought anything off hm in months. Can’t speak for anyone else. I sign up when the sub is cheap, just to see what she’s up to, and am always disappointed that vid quality is still shite.

 

[andyshaw]

I haven’t bought anything off hm in months. Can’t speak for anyone else. I sign up when the sub is cheap, just to see what she’s up to, and am always disappointed that vid quality is still shite.

Oh ok I see! Thanks for sharing your feedback. I completely understand your hesitation when it comes to spending money nowadays. It's also why I am being cautious and seeking information to avoid any potential scams. I'll definitely keep this in mind and continue to be wary as well!

 

[ItsMeTheGoat]

Most people are retarded or blinded by simping. it's not about whether it's HD or not, it's the video filters she uses.View attachment 1990852View attachment 1990853

Har what I would give to see that uncensored

 

[Iluvpussies]

Har what I would give to see that uncensored

You must be registered for see links

 

[javvv]

bella b

View attachment bella b 2023-06-27 22_41.mp4
View attachment Bella b 2023-07-04 22_36.mp4

 

[andyshaw]

You must be registered for see links

Thanks for sharing! I personally don't see any problems with the filters in these videos. They appear clear and of high quality to me. Unlike some Snapchat videos that can make girls unrecognizable or be grainy and blurry, these videos seem to be very detailed. Cheers

 

[jcpenny]

Thanks for sharing! I personally don't see any problems with the filters in these videos. They appear clear and of high quality to me. Unlike some Snapchat videos that can make girls unrecognizable or be grainy and blurry, these videos seem to be very detailed. Cheers

that's fair enough but please compare hm's smeary stuff to these two samples from mm and kk. Actual definition, detail, resolution, minimum filters. hm doesn't come close. If you're paying £30 to £150 and up, you should get good quality.

You must be registered for see links

 

[pedrojuan]

You must be registered for see links

Give anything to see Aria rose spread her arse in a sling bikini like that HM classic.

Linsey dawn mckenzie in here prime:

You must be registered for see links

Infamous boy/girl (Clips from linseysworld) HD

You must be registered for see links

 

[Newboy123]

that's fair enough but please compare hm's smeary stuff to these two samples from mm and kk. Actual definition, detail, resolution, minimum filters. hm doesn't come close. If you're paying £30 to £150 and up, you should get good quality.

You must be registered for see links

View attachment 1990977

I know you were using that as an example but don’t suppose you have any more MM vids ?

 

[jcpenny]

I know you were using that as an example but don’t suppose you have any more MM vids ?

I need to go to bed, I can upload some tomorrow! Quick one from MM, and once again, show me a video from flappers or hm with anything near this picture quality!

You must be registered for see links

 

[andyshaw]

I need to go to bed, I can upload some tomorrow! Quick one from MM, and once again, show me a video from flappers or hm with anything near this picture quality!

You must be registered for see links

I can definitely see the comparison but I was pleasantly surprised by hm vids, as I expected them to be shockingly awful based on your comments but for me they are still watchable and can clearly see certain body parts unlike Low-res Lori! MM does have very high quality content but is also known for scamming and her vid descriptions are often misleading in my experience. I'm curious about recent offerings, but unsure if it's worth purchasing anything at all these days!

 

[Cuntlips]

Looks Like Sophie Reades first scene for Brazzers is out on 17th of July

You must be registered for see links