Milana Vayntrub

profish

Well-Known Member
So you've got a laughing emoji but no answer? She literally just had it in her story a day or two ago with a text box covering the part you keep claiming is fake. Maybe instead of an emoji address the question.
my thought is if it was real you would not see the difference in skin tones where her caption was as an original pic would have all the same tones after "she" removed it from the original but these days who knows and also a reverse search shows limited results with fapello and ero me being the main sources which are some legit pics and fake pic sites--dont get your panties in twist over an emoji and if your that concerned prove its real--see how that works :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Diddler on the Roof

Well-Known Member
my thought is if it was real you would not see the difference in skin tones where her caption was as an original pic would have all the same tones after "she" removed it from the original but these days who knows and also a reverse search shows limited results with fapello and ero me being the main sources which are some legit pics and fake pic sites--dont get your panties in twist over an emoji and if your that concerned prove its real--see how that works :rolleyes:
So you really have no idea. You're guessing and stating it as fact. People like that are the worst. Seems pretty weird that we've seen the leaked version of every other picture in those sets without anyone claiming they're fake but that one that we know is also in the set the only version we've seen is fake? Also seems like a weird coincidence that she has the same difference in skintone in this photo. Is this one fake too then? Or maybe the notorious prude just doesn't tan her tits. It's possible it's fake and it's possible it's not so maybe let's not state it as fact one way or another unless we know for sure, ya?
 

Attachments

  • 620783917_262b41361465d2807.jpg
    620783917_262b41361465d2807.jpg
    321.2 KB · Views: 618
Top